The Jordan Lake Rules were passed in December 2008 by the Environmental Management Commission and are now under review by the North Carolina General Assembly for possible revision. The rules establish requirements in the Jordan Lake watershed for, among other things, wastewater discharges, buffers, agricultural activities, and stormwater management in new and existing development. Approximately half of the City of Durham is in the Jordan watershed. The goal of the rules is to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus in Jordan Lake.
The complete set of proposed rules can be read at the NC Division of Water Quality at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/nps/JordanNutrientStrategy.htm.
The Durham City Council, which has many members who are consistent supporters of environmental groups and initiatives in the region, has determined that not all of the Jordan Rules are in Durham's interest. The Council has endorsed many of the rules -- for example, the "new development" rule. That rule will raise the cost of stormwater controls for new housing and commercial and institutional construction in Durham to the highest in the state. However, the Council opposes some of the rules, particularly the "existing development" rule, given the outrageous costs which will fall on Durham citizens. This would force the City to pay an estimated $570 million, could require condemnation of private property, and take property out of the City’s tax base. The "science" behind Jordan Lake’s condition can certainly be argued both ways, but it is a fact that the lake is successfully serving uses that many experts thought would be impossible when it was constructed.
In fact, the water in the lower New Hope arm of the lake is now used as a source of drinking water for a number of communities, and Durham is working with other local governments to make Jordan Lake a regional water source. Thus, the City is invested in the water quality of Jordan Lake.
A compromise approach is needed to strike a reasonable balance. The "existing development" rule is prohibitively expensive and should be substantially modified. Some rules need to be fine-tuned and others should remain as is. The result of such a compromise will continue to protect Jordan Lake at a more reasonable cost for citizens.